|
Effect of time of application of flupropanate in reducing
seedhead production of serrated tussock
M. H. Campbell and R. Van de Ven
56 Green Lane, Orange and NSW Agriculture, Orange
Agricultural Institute, Orange, 2800
February 2003
Flupropanate (Taskforceâ, 74.5% a.i.) was
applied to mature serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma) growing on
slate derived soil, at three rates, from 14.9 to 4.0 weeks before flowering
began, to examine the effect of different intervals between spraying and the
beginning of flowering on seedhead production (Table 1). The beginning of
flowering is defined as the appearance of the first tips of the awns of the
seeds at the top of the flowering tillers containing them. There were three
replications of each treatment arranged in randomised blocks in an experiment
near Tuena in the southern tablelands of NSW.
Table 1.Reduction (%) in fertile seedheads produced after
applying flupropanate at three rates on six occasions before flowering began;
measured on 20 November 2001
|
Time of spraying in 2001
|
L/ha of flupropanate
|
Rainfall after spraying
|
|
Date
|
Weeks before flowering began
|
1.0
(%)
|
1.5
(%)
|
2.0
(%)
|
Ten days
(mm)
|
|
13 July
|
14.9
|
93 a
|
96 a
|
99 a
|
30
|
|
31 July
|
12.3
|
85 a
|
92 a
|
99 a
|
10
|
|
12 August
|
10.3
|
71 b
|
85 a
|
99 a
|
35
|
|
24 August
|
8.9
|
30 c
|
56 b
|
82 b
|
58
|
|
11 September
|
6.3
|
5 d
|
23 c
|
41 c
|
22
|
|
27 September
|
4.0
|
0 d
|
1 d
|
4 d
|
27
|
Values in
columns not followed by a common letter differ significantly at P>0.05.
Results
The time needed to reduce seedhead production by >90% was
14.9, 12.3 and 10.3 weeks respectively for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L/ha rates of
flupropanate.
In this experiment sufficient rain fell in the ten days
after each spraying (Table 1) for the flupropanate to be washed into the soil
and taken up by the serrated tussock before the next spraying; thus each
spraying was an independent event.
Because flupropanate is a slow acting herbicide (due to the
need to be washed into the soil and taken up by the roots of the weed, and/or
because of slow chemical processes within the plant), it has to be applied
quite a long time before flowering to stop seedhead production. This experiment
determined the minimum time necessary for the three rates of flupropanate used
to substantially reduce seedhead production because sufficient rainfall was
received soon after each spraying to ensure the flupropanate entered the weed
soon after spraying.
By adding a low rate of glyphosate to the flupropanate, the
time between spraying and the beginning of flowering necessary to substantially
reduce seedhead production, can be reduced to two to four weeks (Campbell et
al. 1998). However glyphosate has detrimental effects on useful plants
growing with the serrated tussock and can cause massive seedling reinfestation
of serrated tussock if the useful plants are killed.
Conclusion
As serrated tussock generally begins to flower in late
October at Tuena, it would be necessary to apply 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 L/ha
flupropanate in, respectively, early July, late July or early August to reduce
seedhead production by >90%.
Reference
Campbell, M. H., Miller, L. G. and Nicol, H. I. (1998).
Effect of herbicides on seedhead production and control of serrated tussock. Plant
Protection Quarterly. 13, 106-110.
|